arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1511.07541 [math.CO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Ramsey numbers of trees versus odd cycles

Matthew Brennan

Published 2015-11-24Version 1

Burr, Erd\H{o}s, Faudree, Rousseau and Schelp initiated the study of Ramsey numbers of trees versus odd cycles, proving that $R(T_n, C_m) = 2n - 1$ for all odd $m \ge 3$ and $n \ge 756m^{10}$, where $T_n$ is a tree with $n$ vertices and $C_m$ is an odd cycle of length $m$. They proposed to study the minimum positive integer $n_0(m)$ such that this result holds for all $n \ge n_0(m)$, as a function of $m$. In this paper, we show that $n_0(m)$ is at most linear. In particular, we prove that $R(T_n, C_m) = 2n - 1$ for all odd $m \ge 3$ and $n \ge 50m$. Combining this with a result of Faudree, Lawrence, Parsons and Schelp yields $n_0(m)$ is bounded between two linear functions, thus identifying $n_0(m)$ up to a constant factor.

Comments: 10 pages. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1511.07306
Categories: math.CO
Subjects: 05C55, 05C05, 05C38
Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1103.2685 [math.CO] (Published 2011-03-14, updated 2014-10-27)
Ramsey numbers for trees
arXiv:1501.07786 [math.CO] (Published 2015-01-30)
Stability and Ramsey numbers for cycles and wheels
arXiv:1503.07891 [math.CO] (Published 2015-03-26)
Ramsey numbers for degree monotone paths