arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1508.02597 [math.DS]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Perturbing homeomorphisms of the torus whose rotation sets have rationals in their boundaries

Patrice Le Calvez, Salvador Addas-Zanata

Published 2015-08-11Version 1

Let $f:{\rm T^2\rightarrow T^2}$ be a homeomorphism homotopic to the identity, $\widetilde{f}:{\rm I}\negthinspace {\rm R^2\rightarrow I} \negthinspace {\rm R^2}$ be a fixed lift and $\rho (\widetilde{f})$ be its rotation set, which we assume to have interior. We also assume that some rational point $(\frac pq,\frac rq)\in \partial \rho (\widetilde{f})$ and we want to understand how stable this situation is. To be more precise, we want to know if it is possible to find two different homeomorphisms, which are arbitrarily small $C^0$-perturbations of $f,$ denoted $f_1$ and $f_2,$ in a way that $(\frac pq,\frac rq)$ does not belong to the rotation set of $f_1$ and $(\frac pq,\frac rq)$ is contained in the interior of the rotation set of $f_2.$ We give two examples in this direction. The first is a $C^\infty $-diffeomorphism $f_{dissip},$ such that $(0,0)\in \partial \rho (\widetilde{f}_{dissip}),$ $f_{dissip}$ has only one fixed point with zero rotation vector and there are maps $f_1$ and $f_2$ satisfying the conditions above. The second is an area preserving version of the above, but in this conservative setting we obtain only a $C^0$ example. We also present two theorems in the opposite direction. The first says that if $f$ is area preserving and analytic, then there can not be $f_1$ and $f_2$ as above. The second result, implies that for a generic (in the sense of Brunovsky) one parameter family $% f_t:{\rm T^2\rightarrow T^2}$ of $C^1$-diffeomorphisms such that for some parameter $\overline{t},$ $\rho (\widetilde{f}_{\overline{t}})$ has interior, $(\frac pq,\frac rq) \in \partial \rho (\widetilde{f}_{\overline{t}})$ and $(\frac pq,\frac rq)\notin \rho (\widetilde{f}_t)$ for $t<\overline{t},$ then for all $t> \overline{t}$ sufficiently close to $\overline{t},$ $(\frac pq,\frac rq)\notin int(\rho ( \widetilde{f}_{\overline{t}})).$

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1111.2378 [math.DS] (Published 2011-11-10, updated 2013-02-19)
On torus homeomorphisms whose rotation set is an interval
arXiv:1706.07973 [math.DS] (Published 2017-06-24)
On the computability of rotation sets and their entropies
arXiv:2203.00785 [math.DS] (Published 2022-03-01)
Back to Boundaries in Billiards