arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1507.02118 [math.LO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Uniqueness of Limit Models in Classes with Amalgamation

Rami Grossberg, Monica VanDieren, Andres Villaveces

Published 2015-07-08Version 1

We prove: Main Theorem: Let $\mathcal{K}$ be an abstract elementary class satisfying the joint embedding and the amalgamation properties with no maximal models of cardinality $\mu$. Let $\mu$ be a cardinal above the the L\"owenheim-Skolem number of the class. If $\mathcal{K}$ is $\mu$-Galois-stable, has no $\mu$-Vaughtian Pairs, does not have long splitting chains, and satisfies locality of splitting, then any two $(\mu,\sigma_\ell)$-limits over $M$, for $\ell\in\{1,2\}$, are isomorphic over $M$. This theorem extends results of Shelah from \cite{Sh394}, \cite{Sh576}, \cite{Sh600}, Kolman and Shelah in \cite{KoSh} and Shelah and Villaveces from \cite{ShVi}. A preliminary version of our uniqueness theorem, which was circulated in 2006, was used by Grossberg and VanDieren to prove a case of Shelah's categoricity conjecture for tame abstract elementary classes in \cite{GrVa2}. Preprints of this paper have also influenced the Ph.D. theses of Drueck \cite{Dr} and Zambrano \cite{Za}. This paper also serves the expository role of presenting together the arguments in \cite{Va1} and \cite{Va2} in a more natural context in which the amalgamation property holds and this work provides an approach to the uniqueness of limit models that does not rely on Ehrenfeucht-Mostowski constructions.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1502.04144 [math.LO] (Published 2015-02-13)
Superstability in Tame Abstract Elementary Classes
arXiv:math/0509338 [math.LO] (Published 2005-09-15, updated 2015-02-05)
Uniqueness of Limit Models in Classes with Amalgamation
arXiv:math/0509387 [math.LO] (Published 2005-09-16, updated 2005-09-19)
Shelah's Categoricity Conjecture from a successor for Tame Abstract Elementary Classes