arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1507.01364 [math.CO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Proof of a conjecture on the zero forcing number of a graph

Leihao Lu, Baoyindureng Wu, Zixing Tang

Published 2015-07-06Version 1

Amos et al. (Discrete Appl. Math. 181 (2015) 1-10) introduced the notion of the $k$-forcing number of graph for a positive integer $k$ as the generalization of the zero forcing number of a graph. The $k$-forcing number of a simple graph $G$, denoted by $F_k(G)$, is the minimum number of vertices that need to be initially colored so that all vertices eventually become colored during the discrete dynamical process by the following rule. Starting from an initial set of colored vertices and stopping when all vertices are colored: if a colored vertex has at most $k$ non-colored neighbors, then each of its non-colored neighbors become colored. Particulary, $F_1(G)$ is a widely studied invariant with close connection to the maximum nullity of a graph, under the name of the zero forcing number, denoted by $Z(G)$. Among other things, the authors proved that for a connected graph $G$ of order $n$ with $\Delta=\Delta(G)\geq 2$, $Z(G)\leq \frac{(\Delta-2)n+2}{\Delta-1}$, and this inequality is sharp. Moreover, they conjectured that $Z(G)=\frac{(\Delta-2)n+2}{\Delta-1}$ if and only if $G=C_n$, $G=K_{\Delta+1}$ or $G=K_{\Delta, \Delta}$. In this note, we show the above conjecture is true.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1611.06557 [math.CO] (Published 2016-11-20)
The zero forcing number of graphs with a given
arXiv:1210.4029 [math.CO] (Published 2012-10-15)
A note on balanced independent sets in the cube
arXiv:1012.2545 [math.CO] (Published 2010-12-12)
Proof of Andrews' conjecture on a_4φ_3 summation