arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1505.06090 [astro-ph.HE]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Indications of Negative Evolution for the Sources of the Highest Energy Cosmic Rays

Andrew M. Taylor, Markus Ahlers, Dan Hooper

Published 2015-05-22Version 1

Using recent measurements of the spectrum and chemical composition of the highest energy cosmic rays, we consider the sources of these particles. We find that the data strongly prefers models in which the sources of the ultra-high energy cosmic rays inject predominantly intermediate mass nuclei, with comparatively few protons or heavy nuclei, such as iron or silicon. If the number density of sources per comoving volume does not evolve with redshift, the injected spectrum must be very hard ($\alpha\simeq 1$) in order to fit the spectrum observed at Earth. Such a hard spectral index would be surprising and difficult to accommodate theoretically. In contrast, much softer spectral indices, consistent with the predictions of Fermi acceleration ($\alpha\simeq 2$), are favored in models with negative source evolution. With this theoretical bias, these observations thus favor models in which the sources of the highest energy cosmic rays are preferentially located within the low-redshift universe.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1103.0536 [astro-ph.HE] (Published 2011-03-02, updated 2011-08-13)
Update on tests of the Cen A neutron-emission model of highest energy cosmic rays
arXiv:1009.1855 [astro-ph.HE] (Published 2010-09-09, updated 2010-09-29)
Update on the correlation of the highest energy cosmic rays with nearby extragalactic matter
arXiv:0901.3389 [astro-ph.HE] (Published 2009-01-22)
Mass Composition Studies of the Highest Energy Cosmic Rays