arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1503.04000 [math.LO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Harrington's principle over higher order arithmetic

Yong Cheng, Ralf Schindler

Published 2015-03-13Version 1

Let $Z_2$, $Z_3$, and $Z_4$ denote $2^{\rm nd}$, $3^{\rm rd}$, and $4^{\rm th}$ order arithmetic, respectively. We let Harrington's Principle, {\sf HP}, denote the statement that there is a real $x$ such that every $x$--admissible ordinal is a cardinal in $L$. The known proofs of Harrington's theorem "$Det(\Sigma_1^1)$ implies $0^{\sharp}$ exists" are done in two steps: first show that $Det(\Sigma_1^1)$ implies {\sf HP}, and then show that {\sf HP} implies $0^{\sharp}$ exists. The first step is provable in $Z_2$. In this paper we show that $Z_2 \, + \, {\sf HP}$ is equiconsistent with ${\sf ZFC}$ and that $Z_3\, + \, {\sf HP}$ is equiconsistent with ${\sf ZFC} \, +$ there exists a remarkable cardinal. As a corollary, $Z_3\, + \, {\sf HP}$ does not imply $0^{\sharp}$ exists, whereas $Z_4\, + \, {\sf HP}$ does. We also study strengthenings of Harrington's Principle over $2^{\rm nd}$ and $3^{\rm rd}$ order arithmetic.

Comments: 13 pages, to appear in JSL Volume 80,Issue 2 (June 2015)
Categories: math.LO
Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1312.1531 [math.LO] (Published 2013-12-05, updated 2015-04-08)
Measure theory and higher order arithmetic
arXiv:1402.4659 [math.LO] (Published 2014-02-19, updated 2014-11-30)
Force a set model of $Z_3$ + Harrington's Principle
arXiv:1605.02419 [math.LO] (Published 2016-05-09)
Can you take Toernquist's inaccessible away?