arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1503.01338 [astro-ph.SR]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

On the consistent treatment of the quasi-hydrostatic layers in hot star atmospheres

Andreas Sander, Tomer Shenar, Rainer Hainich, Angel Gímenez-García, Helge Todt, Wolf-Rainer Hamann

Published 2015-03-04Version 1

CONTEXT: Spectroscopic analysis remains the most common method to derive masses of massive stars, the most fundamental stellar parameter. While binary orbits and stellar pulsations can provide much sharper constraints on the stellar mass, these methods are only rarely applicable to massive stars. Unfortunately, spectroscopic masses of massive stars heavily depend on the detailed physics of model atmospheres. AIMS: We demonstrate the impact of a consistent treatment of the radiative pressure on inferred gravities and spectroscopic masses of massive stars. Specifically, we investigate the contribution of line and continuum transitions to the photospheric radiative pressure. We further explore the effect of model parameters, e.g., abundances, on the deduced spectroscopic mass. Lastly, we compare our results with the plane-parallel TLUSTY code, commonly used for the analysis of massive stars with photospheric spectra. METHODS: We calculate a small set of O-star models with the Potsdam Wolf-Rayet (PoWR) code using different approaches for the quasi-hydrostatic part. These models allow us to quantify the effect of accounting for the radiative pressure consistently. We further use PoWR models to show how the Doppler widths of line profiles and abundances of elements such as iron affect the radiative pressure, and, as a consequence, the derived spectroscopic masses. RESULTS: Our study implies that errors on the order of a factor of two in the inferred spectroscopic mass are to be expected when neglecting the contribution of line and continuum transitions to the radiative acceleration in the photosphere. Usage of implausible microturbulent velocities, or the neglect of important opacity sources such as Fe, may result in errors of approximately 50% in the spectroscopic mass. A comparison with TLUSTY model atmospheres reveals a very good agreement with PoWR at the limit of low mass-loss rates.

Comments: 13 pages, 10 figures, accepted for publication in A&A
Categories: astro-ph.SR
Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1409.1760 [astro-ph.SR] (Published 2014-09-05)
Behaviour of Pulsations in Hydrodynamic Models of Massive Stars
arXiv:1305.2099 [astro-ph.SR] (Published 2013-05-09)
Evolution and fate of very massive stars
arXiv:1209.5928 [astro-ph.SR] (Published 2012-09-26)
Mass loss and fate of the most massive stars