arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1408.2900 [quant-ph]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Reply to "Maximal violation of Bell inequalities by position measurements"

Daniel V. Tausk

Published 2014-08-13Version 1

In a recent article, Kiukas and Werner claim to have shown that Bohmian Mechanics does not make the same empirical predictions as ordinary Quantum Mechanics. More precisely, they have shown that ordinary Quantum Mechanics predicts maximal violations of the CHSH-Bell inequality for a certain experiment in which only position measurements are performed on two noninteracting entangled free non-relativistic particles. Kiukas and Werner claim that Bohmian Mechanics doesn't predict a violation of the CHSH-Bell inequality for that experiment. We explain that such claim is wrong and that the argument supporting their claim neglects the fact that Bohmian Mechanics does not satisfy all the assumptions needed to prove the CHSH-Bell inequality. We also clear up another few misconceptions about Bohmian Mechanics appearing in their article.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:quant-ph/0310140 (Published 2003-10-22)
Bell Inequalities for Position Measurements
arXiv:1408.1651 [quant-ph] (Published 2014-08-07)
Comment on: Maximal violation of Bell inequalities by position measurements
arXiv:1410.4935 [quant-ph] (Published 2014-10-18)
Mathematical and physical meaning of the Bell inequalities