arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1407.4665 [astro-ph.GA]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Is there a "too big to fail" problem in the field?

Emmanouil Papastergis, Riccardo Giovanelli, Martha P. Haynes, Francesco Shankar

Published 2014-07-17, updated 2014-09-04Version 2

We use the Arecibo Legacy Fast ALFA (ALFALFA) 21cm survey to measure the number density of galaxies as a function of their rotational velocity, Vrot,HI (as inferred from the width of their 21cm emission line). Based on the measured velocity function we statistically connect galaxies with their host halos, via abundance matching. In a LCDM cosmology, dwarf galaxies are expected to be hosted by halos that are significantly more massive than indicated by the measured galactic velocity; if smaller halos were allowed to host galaxies, then ALFALFA should be measuring a much larger galactic number density. We then seek observational verification of this predicted trend, by analyzing the kinematics of a literature sample of gas-rich dwarf galaxies. We find that galaxies with Vrot,HI<25 km/s are kinematically incompatible with their predicted LCDM host halos, in the sense that hosts are too massive to be accommodated within the measured galactic rotation curves. This issue is analogous to the "too big to fail" problem faced by the bright satellites of the Milky Way, but here it concerns extreme dwarf galaxies in the field. Consequently, solutions based on satellite-specific processes are not applicable in this context. Our result confirms the findings of previous studies based on optical survey data, and addresses a number of observational systematics present in these works. Furthermore, we point out the assumptions and uncertainties that could strongly affect our conclusions. We show that the two most important among them -namely baryonic effects on the abundances of halos and on the rotation curves of halos- do not seem capable of resolving the reported discrepancy (at least when considered individually).

Comments: v2 matches the version submitted to A&A. Main differences with v1 are in Secs 4.1,4.3,4.4 and their figures. 11 figures, 14 pages(+appendix)
Categories: astro-ph.GA, astro-ph.CO
Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:2103.01142 [astro-ph.GA] (Published 2021-03-01)
Exact semianalytical calculation of rotation curves with Bekenstein-Milgrom nonrelativistic MOND
arXiv:2206.05913 [astro-ph.GA] (Published 2022-06-13)
The ALMaQUEST survey. VIII. What causes the velocity discrepancy between CO and Hα rotation curves in galaxies?
Yung-Chau Su et al.
arXiv:2109.02659 [astro-ph.GA] (Published 2021-09-06)
Rotation Curves in z~1-2 Star-Forming Disks: Comparison of Dark Matter Fractions and Disk Properties for Different Fitting Methods
S. H. Price et al.