arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1404.7784 [cs.GT]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Monotonicity, Revenue Equivalence and Budgets

Ahuva Mualem

Published 2014-04-30Version 1

We study multidimensional mechanism design in a common scenario where players have private information about their willingness to pay and their ability to pay. We provide a complete characterization of dominant-strategy incentive-compatible direct mechanisms where over-reporting the budget is not possible. In several settings, reporting larger budgets can be made suboptimal with a small randomized modification to the payments. We then derive a closely related partial characterization for the general case where players can arbitrarily misreport their private budgets. Immediate applications of these results include simple characterizations for mechanisms with publicly-known budgets and for mechanisms without monetary transfers. The celebrated revenue equivalence theorem states that the seller"s revenue for a broad class of standard auction formats and settings will be the same in equilibrium. Our main application is a revenue equivalence theorem for financially constrained bidders.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1403.7625 [cs.GT] (Published 2014-03-29, updated 2014-06-01)
Testing Top Monotonicity
arXiv:1605.09761 [cs.GT] (Published 2016-05-31)
A characterization of combinatorial demand
arXiv:0807.3427 [cs.GT] (Published 2008-07-22)
A characterization of 2-player mechanisms for scheduling