arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1307.0743 [math.NT]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

First Order Decidability and Definability of Integers in Infinite Algebraic Extensions of Rational Numbers

Alexandra Shlapentokh

Published 2013-07-02, updated 2014-10-22Version 3

We extend results of Videla and Fukuzaki to define algebraic integers in large classes of infinite algebraic extensions of Q and use these definitions for some of the fields to show the first-order undecidability. We also obtain a structural sufficient condition for definability of the ring of integers over its field of fractions. In particular, we show that the following propositions hold. (1) For any rational prime $q$ and any positive rational integer $m$, algebraic integers are definable in any Galois extension of Q where the degree of any finite subextension is not divisible by $q^{m}$. (2) Given a prime $q$, and an integer $m>0$, algebraic integers are definable in a cyclotomic extension (and any of its subfields) generated by any set $\{\xi_{p^{\ell}}| \ell \in \Z_{>0}, p \not=q {is any prime such that} q^{m +1}\not | (p-1)\}$. (3) The first-order theory of any abelian extension of Q with finitely many ramified rational primes is undecidable. We also show that under a condition on the splitting of one rational prime in an infinite algebraic extension of Q, the existence of a finitely generated elliptic curve over the field in question is enough to have a definition of Z and to show that the field is indecidable.

Comments: Further revisions to improve readability: added a section with overview of the proof
Categories: math.NT, math.LO
Subjects: 11U05
Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:math/0703907 [math.NT] (Published 2007-03-30)
Characterizing integers among rational numbers with a universal-existential formula
arXiv:0903.2714 [math.NT] (Published 2009-03-16)
The number of rational numbers determined by large sets of integers
arXiv:math/0411096 [math.NT] (Published 2004-11-04)
Root numbers of curves