arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1306.1986 [quant-ph]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

On Determinism and Bell Test

Shoujiang Wang, Xiulan Wang

Published 2013-06-09, updated 2013-07-12Version 3

Many Bell test results violate Bell's inequality. The premise of Bell's inequality is local determinism. We propose that, it can't be proved that something's mechanism isn't deterministic; if loopholes are not the reason of violation of Bell's inequality, violation of Bell's inequality illustrates that the mechanism isn't local. We propose a new explanation of Bell test, and the explanation illustrates the locality loophole is not closed by Weihs' experiment.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1406.3963 [quant-ph] (Published 2014-06-16, updated 2015-02-23)
Determinism, independence and objectivity are incompatible
arXiv:1802.03767 [quant-ph] (Published 2018-02-11)
Determinism and the Theory of Every Thing
arXiv:1301.7578 [quant-ph] (Published 2013-01-31, updated 2013-05-16)
Determinism without causality