arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1306.1763 [math.CO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Bipartite graphs are weak antimagic

Matthias Beck, Michael Jackanich

Published 2013-06-07, updated 2013-10-04Version 3

The \emph{Antimagic Graph Conjecture} asserts that every connected graph $G = (V, E)$ except $K_2$ admits an edge labeling such that each label $1, 2, ..., |E|$ is used exactly once and the sums of the labels on all edges incident with a given node are distinct. We study an associated counting function (replacing the upper bound on the possible labels by a variable) and prove that a variant of this counting function, when we do not require the labels to be distinct, is a polynomial if $G$ is bipartite. As a consequence, we show that every connected bipartite graph $G = (V, E)$ except $K_2$ admits a \emph{weakly} antimagic labeling, that is, each edge label is among $1, 2, ..., |E|$ (repetition allowed) and the sums of the labels on all edges incident with a given node are distinct. We also present a natural extension of these results to directed and bidirected graphs; this extension gives rise to a (bi-)directed version of the Antimagic Graph Conjecture, which might be of independent interest.

Comments: This paper has been withdrawn due to a flaw in the proof of the main result
Categories: math.CO
Subjects: 05C78, 05C22, 05C31, 52B20, 52C35
Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1903.09725 [math.CO] (Published 2019-03-22)
Large homogeneous subgraphs in bipartite graphs with forbidden induced subgraphs
arXiv:1505.03717 [math.CO] (Published 2015-05-14)
A note on $\mathtt{V}$-free $2$-matchings
arXiv:2009.06688 [math.CO] (Published 2020-09-14)
On the number of spanning trees in bipartite graphs