arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1302.0932 [quant-ph]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

When quantum tomography goes wrong: drift of quantum sources and other errors

S. J. van Enk, Robin Blume-Kohout

Published 2013-02-05, updated 2013-02-12Version 2

The principle behind quantum tomography is that a large set of observations -- many samples from a "quorum" of distinct observables -- can all be explained satisfactorily as measurements on a single underlying quantum state or process. Unfortunately, this principle may not hold. When it fails, any standard tomographic estimate should be viewed skeptically. Here we propose a simple way to test for this kind of failure using Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC). We point out that the application of this criterion in a quantum context, while still powerful, is not as straightforward as it is in classical physics. This is especially the case when future observables differ from those constituting the quorum.

Comments: To appear in New Journal of Physics, Focus on Quantum Tomography. Two more references added
Journal: New J. Phys. 15 025024 (2013)
Categories: quant-ph
Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1201.5612 [quant-ph] (Published 2012-01-26, updated 2012-06-07)
Statistical analysis of sampling methods in quantum tomography
arXiv:1708.03820 [quant-ph] (Published 2017-08-12)
Quantum tomography enhanced through parametric amplification
arXiv:1109.5478 [quant-ph] (Published 2011-09-26, updated 2018-04-15)
Quantum Tomography under Prior Information