arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1301.1097 [math.CO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Note on packing of edge-disjoint spanning trees in sparse random graphs

Xiaolin Chen, Xueliang Li, Huishu Lian

Published 2013-01-07Version 1

The \emph{spanning tree packing number} of a graph $G$ is the maximum number of edge-disjoint spanning trees contained in $G$. Let $k\geq 1$ be a fixed integer. Palmer and Spencer proved that in almost every random graph process, the hitting time for having $k$ edge-disjoint spanning trees equals the hitting time for having minimum degree $k$. In this paper, we prove that for any $p$ such that $(\log n+\omega(1))/n\leq p\leq (1.1\log n)/n$, almost surely the random graph $G(n,p)$ satisfies that the spanning tree packing number is equal to the minimum degree. Note that this bound for $p$ will allow the minimum degree to be a function of $n$, and in this sense we improve the result of Palmer and Spencer. Moreover, we also obtain that for any $p$ such that $p\geq (51\log n)/n$, almost surely the random graph $G(n,p)$ satisfies that the spanning tree packing number is less than the minimum degree.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1011.5443 [math.CO] (Published 2010-11-24, updated 2011-11-01)
Corrádi and Hajnal's theorem for sparse random graphs
arXiv:1207.2748 [math.CO] (Published 2012-07-11)
On the number of Hamilton cycles in sparse random graphs
arXiv:0707.2760 [math.CO] (Published 2007-07-18)
Spanning Trees with Many Leaves in Graphs without Diamonds and Blossoms