arXiv:1204.4235 [quant-ph]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources
Comment on "Security Proof for Cryptographic Protocols Based Only on Monogamy of Bell's Inequality Violations"
Won-Young Hwang, Oleg Gittsovich
Published 2012-04-19Version 1
Recently, Pawlowski [Phys. Rev. A 82, 032313 (2010)] claimed to have proven the security of a quantum key distribution by using only the monogamy of Bell's inequality violations. In the proof, however, he tacitly assumed that the eavesdropper's outcome is binary. The assumption cannot be justified because Eve's (eavesdropper's) power can only be limited by natural principle. We provide a counter-example for a step of the proof.
Comments: 1 page, see also reply [PRA 85, 046302 (2012)]
Journal: Physical Review A 85, 046301 (2012)
Categories: quant-ph
Keywords: bells inequality violations, security proof, cryptographic protocols, eavesdroppers outcome, natural principle
Tags: journal article
Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1205.6672 [quant-ph] (Published 2012-05-30)
Reply to "Comment on 'Security proof for cryptographic protocols based only on the monogamy of Bell's inequality violations' "
Security proof for cryptographic protocols based only on the monogamy of Bell's inequality violations
Monogamy of Bell's inequality violations in non-signaling theories