arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1203.2715 [math.LO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

The Non-Axiomatizability of O-Minimality

Alex Rennet

Published 2012-03-13, updated 2012-03-29Version 2

Fix a language L extending the language of real closed fields by at least one new predicate or function symbol. Call an L-structure R pseudo-o-minimal if it is (elementarily equivalent to) an ultraproduct of o-minimal structures. We show that for any recursive list of L-sentences \Lambda, there is a real closed field R satisfying \Lambda, which is not pseudo-o-minimal. In particular, there are locally o-minimal, definably complete real closed fields which are not pseudo-o-minimal. This answers negatively a question raised by Schoutens, and shows that the theory consisting of those L-sentences true in all o-minimal L-structures, called the theory of o-minimality (for L), is not recursively axiomatizable.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:0710.5718 [math.LO] (Published 2007-10-30)
Normal triangulations in o-minimal structures
arXiv:1210.5603 [math.LO] (Published 2012-10-20)
One Dimensional T.T.T Structures
arXiv:0809.4940 [math.LO] (Published 2008-09-29, updated 2009-11-27)
Higher homotopy of groups definable in o-minimal structures