arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1106.2490 [math.LO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Subcompact cardinals, squares, and stationary reflection

Andrew D. Brooke-Taylor, Sy-David Friedman

Published 2011-06-13, updated 2012-02-23Version 2

We generalise Jensen's result on the incompatibility of subcompactness with square. We show that alpha^+-subcompactness of some cardinal less than or equal to alpha precludes square_alpha, but also that square may be forced to hold everywhere where this obstruction is not present. The forcing also preserves other strong large cardinals. Similar results are also given for stationary reflection, with a corresponding strengthening of the large cardinal assumption involved. Finally, we refine the analysis by considering Schimmerling's hierarchy of weak squares, showing which cases are precluded by alpha^+-subcompactness, and again we demonstrate the optimality of our results by forcing the strongest possible squares under these restrictions to hold.

Comments: 18 pages. Corrections and improvements from referee's report made
Categories: math.LO
Subjects: 03E35, 03E55
Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1804.11329 [math.LO] (Published 2018-04-30)
Stationary Reflection
arXiv:1605.05489 [math.LO] (Published 2016-05-18)
Aronszajn trees, square principles, and stationary reflection
arXiv:1908.11145 [math.LO] (Published 2019-08-29)
Stationary Reflection and the failure of SCH