arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1105.3862 [math.PR]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

A BK inequality for randomly drawn subsets of fixed size

J. van den Berg, J. Jonasson

Published 2011-05-19, updated 2011-07-23Version 2

The BK inequality (\cite{BK85}) says that,for product measures on $\{0,1\}^n$, the probability that two increasing events $A$ and $B$ `occur disjointly' is at most the product of the two individual probabilities. The conjecture in \cite{BK85} that this holds for {\em all} events was proved by Reimer (cite{R00}). Several other problems in this area remained open. For instance, although it is easy to see that non-product measures cannot satisfy the above inequality for {\em all} events,there are several such measures which, intuitively, should satisfy the inequality for all{\em increasing} events. One of the most natural candidates is the measure assigning equal probabilities to all configurations with exactly $k$ 1's (and probability 0 to all other configurations). The main contribution of this paper is a proof for these measures. We also point out how our result extends to weighted versions of these measures, and to products of such measures.

Comments: Revised version for PTRF. Equation (13) corrected. Several, mainly stylistic, changes; more compact
Categories: math.PR
Subjects: 60C05, 60K35
Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1104.2137 [math.PR] (Published 2011-04-12, updated 2011-12-19)
The probability of the Alabama paradox
arXiv:1203.3665 [math.PR] (Published 2012-03-16)
BK-type inequalities and generalized random-cluster representations
arXiv:2210.16100 [math.PR] (Published 2022-10-28)
An OSSS-type inequality for uniformly drawn subsets of fixed size