arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1103.3877 [math.DG]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Some Remarks on Nijenhuis Bracket, Formality, and Kähler Manifolds

Paolo de Bartolomeis, Vladimir S. Matveev

Published 2011-03-20Version 1

One (actually, almost the only effective) way to prove formality of a differentiable manifold is to be able to produce a suitable derivation $\delta$ such that $d\delta$-lemma holds. We first show that such derivation $\delta$ generates a (1,1)-tensor field (we denote it by $R$). Then, we show that the supercommutation of $d$ and $\delta$ (which is a natural, essentially necessary condition to get a $d\delta$-lemma) is equivalent to vanishing of the Nijenhujis torsion of $R$. Then, we are looking for sufficient conditions that ensure the $d\delta$-lemma holds: we consider the cases when $R$ is self adjoint with respect to a Riemannian metric or compatible with an almost symplectic structure. Finally, we show that if $R$ is scew-symmetric with respect to a Riemannian metric, has constant determinant, and if its Nijenhujis torsion vanishes, then the orthogonal component of $R$ in its polar decomposition is a complex structure compatible with the metric, which gives us a new characterization of K\"ahler structures

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1607.06238 [math.DG] (Published 2016-07-21)
Product of generalized $p-$Kähler manifolds
arXiv:1910.02531 [math.DG] (Published 2019-10-06)
Kähler manifolds with almost non-negative curvature
arXiv:1903.04390 [math.DG] (Published 2019-03-11)
Gromov-Hausdorff limits of Kähler manifolds with Ricci curvature bounded below, II