arXiv:0910.5660 [quant-ph]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources
Reply to a comment of I. Schmelzer
Published 2009-10-29, updated 2013-02-17Version 6
This is a reply to the comment of Schmelzer on my earlier paper. In contrast to Schmelzer's claims, it is shown that passive locality does not correspond to the completeness condition of EPR. Nevertheless, it is argued that Schmelzer has found several errors in my article which, fortunately, can be corrected. In spite of Schmelzer's arguments, the Fritsche-Haugk theory can be used to define a local hidden variable theory for the singlet state.
Comments: The correct parts of this article are now in a separate article at arxiv.org. The stochastic model in this article must be described in more detail before it is suitable for publication
Categories: quant-ph
Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:2301.10383 [quant-ph] (Published 2023-01-25)
Spectroscopy of photoionization from the $^1E$ singlet state in nitrogen$-$vacancy centers in diamond
Sean M. Blakley, Thuc T. Mai, Stephen J. Moxim, Jason T. Ryan, Adam J. Biacchi, Angela R. Hight Walker, Robert D. McMichael
arXiv:1506.08937 [quant-ph] (Published 2015-06-30)
Excluding the local hidden variable theory with time-reversal Bell test
arXiv:1611.09101 [quant-ph] (Published 2016-11-28)
Quantum Theory and Local Hidden Variable Theory: General Features and Tests for EPR Steering and Bell Non-locality