arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:0907.4419 [math.GT]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Degenerating slopes with respect to Heegaard distance

Jiming Ma, Ruifeng Qiu

Published 2009-07-25, updated 2009-08-14Version 2

Let $M=H_{+}\cup_{S} H_{-}$ be a genus $g$ Heegaard splitting with Heegaard distance $n\geq \kappa+2$: (1) Let $c_{1}$, $c_{2}$ be two slopes in the same component of $\partial_{-}H_{-}$, such that the natural Heegaard splitting $M^{i}=H_{+}\cup_{S} (H_{-}\cup_{c_{i}} 2-handle)$ has distance less than $n$, then the distance of $c_{1}$ and $c_{2}$ in the curve complex of $\partial_{-}H_{-}$ is at most $3\mathfrak{M}+2$, where $\kappa$ and $\mathfrak{M}$ are constants due to Masur-Minsky. (2) Let $M^{*}$ be the manifold obtained by attaching a collection of handlebodies $\mathscr{H}$ to $\partial_{-} H_{-}$ along a map $f$ from $\partial \mathscr{H}$ to $\partial_{-} H_{-}$. If $f$ is a sufficiently large power of a generic pseudo-Anosov map, then the distance of the Heegaard splitting $M^{*}=H_{+}\cup (H_{-}\cup_{f} \mathscr{H})$ is still $n$. The proofs rely essentially on Masur-Minsky's theory of curve complex.

Comments: V2; Added references and corrected typos
Categories: math.GT
Subjects: 57M27
Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:2009.07041 [math.GT] (Published 2020-09-15)
Heegaard distance of the link complements in $S^3$
arXiv:math/0410278 [math.GT] (Published 2004-10-11, updated 2005-01-12)
Proximity in the curve complex: boundary reduction and bicompressible surfaces
arXiv:0803.2751 [math.GT] (Published 2008-03-19, updated 2013-08-26)
Hyperbolic volume and Heegaard distance