arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:0905.0135 [math.CO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Sums and products along sparse graphs

Noga Alon, Omer Angel, Itai Benjamini, Eyal Lubetzky

Published 2009-05-01, updated 2009-09-08Version 4

In their seminal paper from 1983, Erd\H{o}s and Szemer\'edi showed that any $n$ distinct integers induce either $n^{1+\epsilon}$ distinct sums of pairs or that many distinct products, and conjectured a lower bound of $n^{2-o(1)}$. They further proposed a generalization of this problem, in which the sums and products are taken along the edges of a given graph $G$ on $n$ labeled vertices. They conjectured a version of the sum-product theorem for general graphs that have at least $n^{1+\epsilon}$ edges. In this work, we consider sum-product theorems for sparse graphs, and show that this problem has important consequences already when $G$ is a matching (i.e., $n/2$ disjoint edges): Any lower bound of the form $n^{1/2+\delta}$ for its sum-product over the integers implies a lower bound of $n^{1+\delta}$ for the original Erd\H{o}s-Szemer\'edi problem. In contrast, over the reals the minimal sum-product for the matching is $\Theta(\sqrt{n})$, hence this approach has the potential of achieving lower bounds specialized to the integers. We proceed to give lower and upper bounds for this problem in different settings. In addition, we provide tight bounds for sums along expanders. A key element in our proofs is a reduction from the sum-product of a matching to the maximum number of translates of a set of integers into the perfect squares. This problem was originally studied by Euler, and we obtain a stronger form of Euler's result using elliptic curve analysis.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1309.3625 [math.CO] (Published 2013-09-14, updated 2014-03-14)
A Lower Bound on the Crossing Number of Uniform Hypergraphs
arXiv:0809.2282 [math.CO] (Published 2008-09-12, updated 2015-05-31)
New lower bounds for the number of blocks in balanced incomplete block designs
arXiv:0802.0015 [math.CO] (Published 2008-01-31, updated 2012-01-10)
The dimensions of LU(3,q) codes