arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:0812.0836 [math.LO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Expansions of the real field by open sets: definability versus interpretability

H. Friedman, K. Kurdyka, C. Miller, P. Speissegger

Published 2008-12-04, updated 2008-12-06Version 2

An open set U of the real numbers R is produced such that the expansion (R,+,x,U) of the real field by U defines a Borel isomorph of (R,+,x,N) but does not define N. It follows that (R,+,x,U) defines sets in every level of the projective hierarchy but does not define all projective sets. This result is elaborated in various ways that involve geometric measure theory and working over o-minimal expansions of (R,+,x). In particular, there is a Cantor subset K of R such that for every exponentially bounded o-minimal expansion M of (R,+,x), every subset of R definable in (M,K) either has interior or is Hausdorff null.

Comments: 14 pages
Categories: math.LO
Subjects: 03C64, 03E15
Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1510.00964 [math.LO] (Published 2015-10-04)
Metric dimensions and tameness in expansions of the real field
arXiv:1812.10151 [math.LO] (Published 2018-12-25)
Expansions of real closed fields which introduce no new smooth functions
arXiv:1812.05547 [math.LO] (Published 2018-12-13)
Expansions of the real field by canonical products