arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:0709.0894 [cond-mat.dis-nn]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Comment on "Ultrametricity in the Edwards-Anderson Model"

Thomas Jorg, Florent Krzakala

Published 2007-09-06Version 1

In a recent interesting Letter Contucci {\it et al.} have investigated several properties of the three-dimensional (3d) Edwards-Anderson (EA) Ising spin glass. They claim to have found strong numerical evidence for the presence of a complex ultrametric structure similar to the one described by the replica symmetry breaking solution of the mean field model. We illustrate by numerical simulations that the relations used by Contucci {\it et al.} as evidence for an ultrametric structure in the 3d EA model are fulfilled to similar accuracy in the two-dimensional EA model, which is well-described by the droplet picture and has no spin glass phase at finite temperature. We conclude that the data presented in the Contucci {\it et al.} Letter is not sufficient to dismiss the possibility that, e.g., the droplet model might describe the behavior of the 3d EA model.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:cond-mat/9905189 (Published 1999-05-13, updated 1999-12-10)
On the origin of ultrametricity
arXiv:cond-mat/0607376 (Published 2006-07-14, updated 2007-06-15)
Ultrametricity in the Edwards-Anderson Model
arXiv:0712.1431 [cond-mat.dis-nn] (Published 2007-12-10, updated 2007-12-12)
Answer to Comment on "Ultrametricity in the Edwards-Anderson Model" arXiv:0709.0894