{ "id": "math/0609644", "version": "v1", "published": "2006-09-22T14:48:29.000Z", "updated": "2006-09-22T14:48:29.000Z", "title": "Shape-Wilf-ordering of permutations of length 3", "authors": [ "Zvezdelina Stankova" ], "comment": "38 pages, 32 figures", "categories": [ "math.CO" ], "abstract": "The research on pattern-avoidance has yielded so far limited knowledge on Wilf-ordering of permutations. The Stanley-Wilf limits sqrt[n](|S_n(tau)|) and further works suggest asymptotic ordering of layered versus monotone patterns. Yet, Bona has provided the only known up to now result of its type on ordering of permutations: |S_n(1342)|<|S_n(1234)|<|S_n(1324)| for n>6. We give a different proof of this result by ordering S_3 up to the stronger shape-Wilf-order: |S_Y(213)|<=|S_Y(123)|<=|S_Y(312)| for any Young diagram Y, derive as a consequence that |S_Y(k+2,k+1,k+3,tau)|<=|S_Y(k+1,k+2,k+3,tau)|<= |S_Y(k+3,k+1,k+2,tau)| for any tau in S_k, and find out when equalities are obtained. (In particular, for specific Y's we find out that |S_Y(123)|=|S_Y(312)| coincide with every other Fibonacci term.) This strengthens and generalizes Bona's result to arbitrary length permutations. While all length-3 permutations have been shown in numerous ways to be Wilf-equivalent, the current paper distinguishes between and orders these permutations by employing all Young diagrams. This opens up the question of whether shape-Wilf-ordering of permutations, or some generalization of it, is not the ``true'' way of approaching pattern-avoidance ordering.", "revisions": [ { "version": "v1", "updated": "2006-09-22T14:48:29.000Z" } ], "analyses": { "subjects": [ "05A20", "05A15" ], "keywords": [ "young diagram", "generalizes bonas result", "arbitrary length permutations", "current paper distinguishes", "specific ys" ], "note": { "typesetting": "TeX", "pages": 38, "language": "en", "license": "arXiv", "status": "editable", "adsabs": "2006math......9644S" } } }