{ "id": "math/0607258", "version": "v5", "published": "2006-07-11T13:29:23.000Z", "updated": "2012-02-19T15:37:10.000Z", "title": "Behavior of knot invariants under genus 2 mutation", "authors": [ "Nathan M. Dunfield", "Stavros Garoufalidis", "Alexander Shumakovitch", "Morwen Thistlethwaite" ], "comment": "24 pages, 7 figures. v2: Added references. v3: Final published version; v4: Includes erratum correcting proofs of results depending on Proposition 2.7, which is false", "journal": "New York J. Math., 16 (2010) 99-123", "categories": [ "math.GT", "math.QA" ], "abstract": "Genus 2 mutation is the process of cutting a 3-manifold along an embedded closed genus 2 surface, twisting by the hyper-elliptic involution, and gluing back. This paper compares genus 2 mutation with the better-known Conway mutation in the context of knots in the 3-sphere. Despite the fact that any Conway mutation can be achieved by a sequence of at most two genus 2 mutations, the invariants that are preserved by genus 2 mutation are a proper subset of those preserved by Conway mutation. In particular, while the Alexander and Jones polynomials are preserved by genus 2 mutation, the HOMFLY-PT polynomial is not. In the case of the sl_2-Khovanov homology, which may or may not be invariant under Conway mutation, we give an example where genus 2 mutation changes this homology. Finally, using these techniques, we exhibit examples of knots with the same same colored Jones polynomials, HOMFLY-PT polynomial, Kauffman polynomial, signature and volume, but different Khovanov homology.", "revisions": [ { "version": "v5", "updated": "2012-02-19T15:37:10.000Z" } ], "analyses": { "subjects": [ "57N10" ], "keywords": [ "knot invariants", "homfly-pt polynomial", "better-known conway mutation", "paper compares genus", "mutation changes" ], "tags": [ "journal article" ], "note": { "typesetting": "TeX", "pages": 24, "language": "en", "license": "arXiv", "status": "editable", "adsabs": "2006math......7258D" } } }