{ "id": "2212.00489", "version": "v1", "published": "2022-12-01T13:33:17.000Z", "updated": "2022-12-01T13:33:17.000Z", "title": "The Biggest Five of Reverse Mathematics", "authors": [ "Dag Normann", "Sam Sanders" ], "comment": "37 pages + Appendix + References", "categories": [ "math.LO" ], "abstract": "The aim of Reverse Mathematics(RM for short)is to find the minimal axioms needed to prove a given theorem of ordinary mathematics. These minimal axioms are almost always equivalent to the theorem, working over the base theory of RM, a weak system of computable mathematics. The Big Five phenomenon of RM is the observation that a large number of theorems from ordinary mathematics are either provable in the base theory or equivalent to one of only four systems; these five systems together are called the 'Big Five'. The aim of this paper is to greatly extend the Big Five phenomenon as follows: there are two supposedly fundamentally different approaches to RM where the main difference is whether the language is restricted to second-order objects or if one allows third-order objects. In this paper, we unite these two strands of RM by establishing numerous equivalences involving the second-order Big Five systems on one hand, and well-known third-order theorems from analysis about (possibly) discontinuous functions on the other hand. We both study relatively tame notions, like cadlag or Baire 1, and potentially wild ones, like quasi-continuity. We also show that slight generalisations and variations of the aforementioned third-order theorems fall far outside of the Big Five.", "revisions": [ { "version": "v1", "updated": "2022-12-01T13:33:17.000Z" } ], "analyses": { "subjects": [ "03B30", "03F35" ], "keywords": [ "reverse mathematics", "third-order theorems fall far outside", "base theory", "ordinary mathematics", "minimal axioms" ], "note": { "typesetting": "TeX", "pages": 37, "language": "en", "license": "arXiv", "status": "editable" } } }