{
  "id": "2106.07756",
  "version": "v1",
  "published": "2021-06-14T20:56:37.000Z",
  "updated": "2021-06-14T20:56:37.000Z",
  "title": "Counterfactual Explanations for Machine Learning: Challenges Revisited",
  "authors": [
    "Sahil Verma",
    "John Dickerson",
    "Keegan Hines"
  ],
  "comment": "Presented at CHI HCXAI 2021 workshop",
  "categories": [
    "cs.LG",
    "cs.AI"
  ],
  "abstract": "Counterfactual explanations (CFEs) are an emerging technique under the umbrella of interpretability of machine learning (ML) models. They provide ``what if'' feedback of the form ``if an input datapoint were $x'$ instead of $x$, then an ML model's output would be $y'$ instead of $y$.'' Counterfactual explainability for ML models has yet to see widespread adoption in industry. In this short paper, we posit reasons for this slow uptake. Leveraging recent work outlining desirable properties of CFEs and our experience running the ML wing of a model monitoring startup, we identify outstanding obstacles hindering CFE deployment in industry.",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "version": "v1",
      "updated": "2021-06-14T20:56:37.000Z"
    }
  ],
  "analyses": {
    "keywords": [
      "counterfactual explanations",
      "machine learning",
      "challenges",
      "ml models output",
      "outstanding obstacles hindering cfe deployment"
    ],
    "note": {
      "typesetting": "TeX",
      "pages": 0,
      "language": "en",
      "license": "arXiv",
      "status": "editable"
    }
  }
}