{
  "id": "2009.12284",
  "version": "v1",
  "published": "2020-09-25T15:17:10.000Z",
  "updated": "2020-09-25T15:17:10.000Z",
  "title": "Reply to a \"Comment on 'Physics without determinism: Alternative interpretations of classical physics' \"",
  "authors": [
    "Flavio Del Santo",
    "Nicolas Gisin"
  ],
  "comment": "Accepted in Physical Review A",
  "categories": [
    "quant-ph"
  ],
  "abstract": "In this short note we reply to a comment by Callegaro et al. [1] (arXiv:2009.11709) that points out some weakness of the model of indeterministic physics that we proposed in Ref. [2] (Physical Review A, 100(6), p.062107), based on what we named \"finite information quantities\" (FIQs). While we acknowledge the merit of their criticism, we maintain that it applies only to a concrete example that we discussed in [2], whereas the main concept of FIQ remains valid and suitable for describing indeterministic physical models. We hint at a more sophisticated way to define FIQs which, taking inspiration from intuitionistic mathematics, would allow to overcome the criticisms in [1].",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "version": "v1",
      "updated": "2020-09-25T15:17:10.000Z"
    }
  ],
  "analyses": {
    "keywords": [
      "alternative interpretations",
      "classical physics",
      "determinism",
      "finite information quantities",
      "fiq remains valid"
    ],
    "note": {
      "typesetting": "TeX",
      "pages": 0,
      "language": "en",
      "license": "arXiv",
      "status": "editable"
    }
  }
}