{ "id": "2009.10662", "version": "v1", "published": "2020-09-22T16:32:47.000Z", "updated": "2020-09-22T16:32:47.000Z", "title": "Implications of gauge-freedom for non-relativistic quantum electrodynamics", "authors": [ "Adam Stokes", "Ahsan Nazir" ], "comment": "Review article. 57 pages including appendix", "categories": [ "quant-ph" ], "abstract": "We review gauge-freedom in quantum electrodynamics (QED) outside of textbook regimes. We emphasise that QED subsystems are defined {\\em relative} to a choice of gauge. Each definition uses different gauge-invariant observables. We show that this relativity is only eliminated if a sufficient number of Markovian and weak-coupling approximations are employed. All physical predictions are gauge-invariant, including subsystem properties such as photon number and entanglement. However, subsystem properties naturally differ for different physical subsystems. Gauge-ambiguities arise not because it is unclear how to obtain gauge-invariant predictions, but because it is not always clear which physical observables are the most operationally relevant. The gauge-invariance of a prediction is necessary but not sufficient to ensure its operational relevance. We show that in controlling which gauge-invariant observables are used to define a material system, the choice of gauge affects the balance between the material system's localisation and its electromagnetic dressing. We review various implications of subsystem gauge-relativity for deriving effective models, for describing time-dependent interactions, for photodetection theory, and for describing matter within a cavity.", "revisions": [ { "version": "v1", "updated": "2020-09-22T16:32:47.000Z" } ], "analyses": { "keywords": [ "non-relativistic quantum electrodynamics", "implications", "gauge-invariant observables", "subsystem properties", "material systems localisation" ], "tags": [ "review article" ], "note": { "typesetting": "TeX", "pages": 57, "language": "en", "license": "arXiv", "status": "editable" } } }