{
  "id": "2001.03337",
  "version": "v1",
  "published": "2020-01-10T08:15:59.000Z",
  "updated": "2020-01-10T08:15:59.000Z",
  "title": "Observational Constraints on the Common Envelope Phase",
  "authors": [
    "David Jones"
  ],
  "comment": "29 pages, 8 figures. To appear in the book \"Reviews in Frontiers of Modern Astrophysics: From Space Debris to Cosmology\" (eds. Kabath, Jones and Skarka; publisher Springer Nature) funded by the European Union Erasmus+ Strategic Partnership grant \"Per Aspera Ad Astra Simul\" 2017-1-CZ01-KA203-035562",
  "doi": "10.1007/978-3-030-38509-5",
  "categories": [
    "astro-ph.SR"
  ],
  "abstract": "The common envelope phase was first proposed more than forty years ago to explain the origins of evolved, close binaries like cataclysmic variables. It is now believed that the phase plays a critical role in the formation of a wide variety of other phenomena ranging from type Ia supernovae through to binary black holes, while common envelope mergers are likely responsible for a range of enigmatic transients and supernova imposters. Yet, despite its clear importance, the common envelope phase is still rather poorly understood. Here, we outline some of the basic principles involved, the remaining questions as well as some of the recent observational hints from common envelope phenomena - namely planetary nebulae and luminous red novae - which may lead to answering these open questions.",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "version": "v1",
      "updated": "2020-01-10T08:15:59.000Z"
    }
  ],
  "analyses": {
    "keywords": [
      "common envelope phase",
      "observational constraints",
      "common envelope phenomena",
      "common envelope mergers",
      "type ia supernovae"
    ],
    "tags": [
      "journal article"
    ],
    "publication": {
      "publisher": "Springer"
    },
    "note": {
      "typesetting": "TeX",
      "pages": 29,
      "language": "en",
      "license": "arXiv",
      "status": "editable"
    }
  }
}