{ "id": "1802.08224", "version": "v1", "published": "2018-02-22T18:23:52.000Z", "updated": "2018-02-22T18:23:52.000Z", "title": "Thresholds for vanishing of `Isolated' faces in random Čech and Vietoris-Rips complexes", "authors": [ "Srikanth K. Iyer", "D. Yogeshwaran" ], "comment": "29 pages, 1 figure", "categories": [ "math.PR", "math.CO" ], "abstract": "We study combinatorial connectivity for two models of random geometric complexes. These two models - \\v{C}ech and Vietoris-Rips complexes - are built on a homogeneous Poisson point process of intensity $n$ on a $d$-dimensional torus using balls of radius $r_n$. In the former, the $k$-simplices/faces are formed by subsets of $(k+1)$ Poisson points such that the balls of radius $r_n$ centred at these points have a mutual interesection and in the latter, we require only a pairwise intersection of the balls. Given a (simplicial) complex (i.e., a collection of $k$-simplices for all $k \\geq 1$), we can connect $k$-simplices via $(k+1)$-simplices (`up-connectivity') or via $(k-1)$-simplices (`down-connectivity). Our interest is to understand these two combinatorial notions of connectivity for the random \\v{C}ech and Vietoris-Rips complexes asymptically as $n \\to \\infty$. In particular, we analyse in detail the threshold radius for vanishing of isolated $k$-faces for up and down connectivity of both types of random geometric complexes. Though it is expected that the threshold radius $r_n = \\Theta((\\frac{\\log n}{n})^{1/d})$ in coarse scale, our results give tighter bounds on the constants in the logarithmic scale as well as shed light on the possible second-order correction factors. Further, they also reveal interesting differences between the phase transition in the \\v{C}ech and Vietoris-Rips cases. The analysis is interesting due to the non-monotonicity of the number of isolated $k$-faces (as a function of the radius) and leads one to consider `monotonic' vanishing of isolated $k$-faces. The latter coincides with the vanishing threshold mentioned above at a coarse scale (i.e., $\\log n$ scale) but differs in the $\\log \\log n$ scale for the \\v{C}ech complex with $k = 1$ in the up-connected case.", "revisions": [ { "version": "v1", "updated": "2018-02-22T18:23:52.000Z" } ], "analyses": { "subjects": [ "60D05", "05E45", "60B99", "05C80" ], "keywords": [ "vietoris-rips complexes", "random geometric complexes", "coarse scale", "threshold radius", "second-order correction factors" ], "note": { "typesetting": "TeX", "pages": 29, "language": "en", "license": "arXiv", "status": "editable" } } }