{
  "id": "1705.04196",
  "version": "v1",
  "published": "2017-05-11T14:15:10.000Z",
  "updated": "2017-05-11T14:15:10.000Z",
  "title": "Plasma vs Drude modelling of the Casimir force: beyond the proximity force approximation",
  "authors": [
    "Michael Hartmann",
    "Gert-Ludwig Ingold",
    "Paulo A. Maia Neto"
  ],
  "comment": "5 pages, 3 figures",
  "categories": [
    "quant-ph",
    "cond-mat.stat-mech"
  ],
  "abstract": "We calculate the Casimir force and its gradient between a spherical and a planar gold surface. Significant numerical improvements allow us to extend the range of accessible parameters into the experimental regime. We compare our numerically exact results with those obtained within the proximity force approximation (PFA) employed in the analysis of all Casimir force experiments reported in the literature so far. Special attention is paid to the difference between the Drude model and the dissipationless plasma model at zero frequency. It is found that the correction to PFA is too small to explain the discrepancy between the experimental data and the PFA result based on the Drude model. However, it turns out that for the plasma model, the corrections to PFA lie outside the experimental bound obtained by probing the variation of the force gradient with the sphere radius [D. E. Krause et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 050403 (2007)]. On the other hand, the correction obtained on the basis of the Drude model is more consistent with experimental bounds.",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "version": "v1",
      "updated": "2017-05-11T14:15:10.000Z"
    }
  ],
  "analyses": {
    "keywords": [
      "proximity force approximation",
      "drude model",
      "plasma model",
      "experimental bound",
      "correction"
    ],
    "note": {
      "typesetting": "TeX",
      "pages": 5,
      "language": "en",
      "license": "arXiv",
      "status": "editable"
    }
  }
}