{
  "id": "1611.05292",
  "version": "v1",
  "published": "2016-11-16T14:38:48.000Z",
  "updated": "2016-11-16T14:38:48.000Z",
  "title": "Shelah-Villaveces revisited",
  "authors": [
    "Will Boney",
    "Monica M. VanDieren",
    "Sebastien Vasey"
  ],
  "comment": "22 pages",
  "categories": [
    "math.LO"
  ],
  "abstract": "We study uniqueness of limit models in abstract elementary classes (AECs) with no maximal models. We prove (assuming instances of diamonds) that categoricity in a cardinal of the form $\\mu^{+(n + 1)}$ implies the uniqueness of limit models of cardinality $\\mu^{+}, \\mu^{++}, \\ldots, \\mu^{+n}$. This sheds light on a paper of Shelah and Villaveces, who were the first to consider uniqueness of limit models in this context. We also prove that (again assuming instances of diamonds) in an AEC with no maximal models, tameness (a locality property for types) together with categoricity in a proper class of cardinals imply categoricity on a tail of cardinals. This is the first categoricity transfer theorem in that setup and answers a question of Baldwin.",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "version": "v1",
      "updated": "2016-11-16T14:38:48.000Z"
    }
  ],
  "analyses": {
    "subjects": [
      "03C48",
      "03C45",
      "03C52",
      "03C55"
    ],
    "keywords": [
      "limit models",
      "maximal models",
      "shelah-villaveces",
      "first categoricity transfer theorem",
      "assuming instances"
    ],
    "note": {
      "typesetting": "TeX",
      "pages": 22,
      "language": "en",
      "license": "arXiv",
      "status": "editable"
    }
  }
}