{
  "id": "1610.05764",
  "version": "v1",
  "published": "2016-10-18T10:53:57.000Z",
  "updated": "2016-10-18T10:53:57.000Z",
  "title": "Reply to \"Comment on \"Critical Point Scaling of Ising Spin Glasses in a Magnetic Field\" \"",
  "authors": [
    "Joonhyun Yeo",
    "M. A. Moore"
  ],
  "comment": "To appear in Physical Review B; Reply to arXiv:1610.04747",
  "categories": [
    "cond-mat.dis-nn",
    "cond-mat.stat-mech"
  ],
  "abstract": "In his Comment, Temesv\\'{a}ri objects to a remark in our paper [Phys.\\ Rev.\\ B {\\bf 91}, 104432 (2015)] that his result for the form of the Almeida-Thouless (AT) line obtained in an earlier paper with Parisi [Nucl.\\ Phys.\\ B {\\bf 858}, 293 (2012)] in six dimensions can be obtained by taking the limit of $d \\to 6$ in the equations valid for $d>6$, but that this violated one of the inequalities needed for their validity. He is just pointing out that they gave a derivation of the form of the AT line in six dimensions in [Nucl.\\ Phys.\\ B {\\bf 858}, 293 (2012)] which avoided this difficulty. However, it is still a perturbative approach, and does not deal with the lack of a perturbative fixed point found by Bray and Roberts [J. Phys. C {\\bf 13}, 5405 (1980)] long ago.",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "version": "v1",
      "updated": "2016-10-18T10:53:57.000Z"
    }
  ],
  "analyses": {
    "keywords": [
      "ising spin glasses",
      "critical point scaling",
      "magnetic field",
      "earlier paper",
      "dimensions"
    ],
    "note": {
      "typesetting": "TeX",
      "pages": 0,
      "language": "en",
      "license": "arXiv",
      "status": "editable"
    }
  }
}