{ "id": "1505.07013", "version": "v1", "published": "2015-05-26T15:32:30.000Z", "updated": "2015-05-26T15:32:30.000Z", "title": "Constraining the Braking Indices of Magnetars", "authors": [ "Z. F. Gao", "X. D. Li", "N. Wang", "J. P. Yuan", "Q. H. Peng", "Y. J. Du" ], "comment": "13 Pages, 3 figures, submitted to MNRAS", "categories": [ "astro-ph.HE", "astro-ph.SR" ], "abstract": "Due to the lack of long term pulsed emission in quiescence and the strong timing noise, it is impossible to directly measure the braking index $n$ of a magnetar. Based on the estimated ages of their potentially associated supernova remnants (SNRs), we estimate the values of $n$ of nine magnetars with SNRs, and find that they cluster in a range of $1\\sim$41. Six magnetars have smaller braking indices of $13$ for other three magnetars are attributed to the decay of external braking torque, which might be caused by magnetic field decay. We estimate the possible wind luminosities for the magnetars with $13$ within the updated magneto-thermal evolution models. We point out that there could be some connections between the magnetar's anti-glitch event and its braking index, and the magnitude of $n$ should be taken into account when explaining the event. Although the constrained range of the magnetars' braking indices is tentative, our method provides an effective way to constrain the magnetars' braking indices if the measurements of the SNRs' ages are reliable, which can be improved by future observations.", "revisions": [ { "version": "v1", "updated": "2015-05-26T15:32:30.000Z" } ], "analyses": { "keywords": [ "braking index", "dipolar magnetic field decay rates", "long term pulsed emission", "updated magneto-thermal evolution models", "magnetars anti-glitch event" ], "publication": { "doi": "10.1093/mnras/stv2465" }, "note": { "typesetting": "TeX", "pages": 13, "language": "en", "license": "arXiv", "status": "editable", "inspire": 1373260 } } }