{ "id": "1501.05327", "version": "v1", "published": "2015-01-21T21:18:06.000Z", "updated": "2015-01-21T21:18:06.000Z", "title": "Turing jumps through provability", "authors": [ "Joost J. Joosten" ], "categories": [ "math.LO" ], "abstract": "Fixing some computably enumerable theory $T$, the Friedman-Goldfarb-Harrington (FGH) theorem says that over elementary arithmetic, each $\\Sigma_1$ formula is equivalent to some formula of the form $\\Box_T \\varphi$ provided that $T$ is consistent. In this paper we give various generalizations of the FGH theorem. In particular, for $n>1$ we relate $\\Sigma_{n}$ formulas to provability statements $[n]_T^{\\sf True}\\varphi$ which are a formalization of \"provable in $T$ together with all true $\\Sigma_{n+1}$ sentences\". As a corollary we conclude that each $[n]_T^{\\sf True}$ is $\\Sigma_{n+1}$-complete. This observation yields us to consider a recursively defined hierarchy of provability predicates $[n+1]^\\Box_T$ which look a lot like $[n+1]_T^{\\sf True}$ except that where $[n+1]_T^{\\sf True}$ calls upon the oracle of all true $\\Sigma_{n+2}$ sentences, the $[n+1]^\\Box_T$ recursively calls upon the oracle of all true sentences of the form $\\langle n \\rangle_T^\\Box\\phi$. As such we obtain a `syntax-light' characterization of $\\Sigma_{n+1}$ definability whence of Turing jumps which is readily extended beyond the finite. Moreover, we observe that the corresponding provability predicates $[n+1]_T^\\Box$ are well behaved in that together they provide a sound interpretation of the polymodal provability logic ${\\sf GLP}_\\omega$.", "revisions": [ { "version": "v1", "updated": "2015-01-21T21:18:06.000Z" } ], "analyses": { "keywords": [ "turing jumps", "polymodal provability logic", "fgh theorem", "elementary arithmetic", "theorem says" ], "note": { "typesetting": "TeX", "pages": 0, "language": "en", "license": "arXiv", "status": "editable", "adsabs": "2015arXiv150105327J" } } }