{ "id": "1407.8035", "version": "v2", "published": "2014-07-30T13:27:46.000Z", "updated": "2015-11-30T14:25:41.000Z", "title": "On Chromatic Number and Minimum Cut", "authors": [ "Meysam Alishahi", "Hossein Hajiabolhassan" ], "categories": [ "math.CO" ], "abstract": "For a graph $G$, the tree graph ${\\cal T}_{G,t}$ has all tree subgraphs of $G$ with $t$ vertices as vertex set and two tree subgraphs are neighbors if they are edge-disjoint. Also, the $r^{th}$ cut number of $G$ is the minimum number of edges between parts of a partition of vertex set of $G$ into two parts such that each part has size at least $r$. We show that if $t=(1-o(1))n$ and $n$ is large enough, then for any dense graph $G$ with $n$ vertices, the chromatic number of the tree graph ${\\cal T}_{G,t}$ is equal to the $(n-t+1)^{th}$ cut number of $G$. In particular, as a consequence, we prove that if $n$ is large enough and $G$ is a dense graph, then the chromatic number of the spanning tree graph ${\\cal T}_{G,n}$ is equal to the size of the minimum cut of $G$. The proof method is based on alternating Tur\\'an number inspired by Tucker's lemma, an equivalent combinatorial version of the Borsuk-Ulam theorem.", "revisions": [ { "version": "v1", "updated": "2014-07-30T13:27:46.000Z", "abstract": "For a graph $G$, the tree graph ${\\cal T}_{G,t}$ has all tree subgraphs of $G$ with $t$ vertices as vertex set and two tree subgraphs are neighbors if they are edge-disjoint. Also, the $r^{th}$ cut number of $G$ is the minimum number of edges between parts of a partition of vertex set of $G$ into two parts such that each part has size at least $r$. We show that if $t=(1-o(1))n$ and $n$ is large enough, then for any dense graph $G$ with $n$ vertices, the chromatic number of the tree graph ${\\cal T}_{G,t}$ is equal to the $(n-t+1)^{th}$ cut number of $G$. In particular, as a consequence, we prove that if $n$ is large enough and $G$ is a dense graph, then the chromatic number of the spanning tree graph ${\\cal T}_{G,n}$ is equal to the size of the minimum cut of $G$. The proof method is based on alternating chromatic number inspired by Tucker's lemma, an equivalent combinatorial version of the Borsuk-Ulam theorem.", "comment": null, "journal": null, "doi": null }, { "version": "v2", "updated": "2015-11-30T14:25:41.000Z" } ], "analyses": { "subjects": [ "05C15" ], "keywords": [ "chromatic number", "minimum cut", "tree graph", "tree subgraphs", "dense graph" ], "note": { "typesetting": "TeX", "pages": 0, "language": "en", "license": "arXiv", "status": "editable", "adsabs": "2014arXiv1407.8035A" } } }