{ "id": "1211.0843", "version": "v2", "published": "2012-11-05T12:26:53.000Z", "updated": "2013-04-14T16:03:17.000Z", "title": "Comment on \"Evidence of Non-Mean-Field-Like Low-Temperature Behavior in the Edwards-Anderson Spin-Glass Model\"", "authors": [ "A. Billoire", "L. A. Fernandez", "A. Maiorano", "E. Marinari", "V. Martin-Mayor", "G. Parisi", "F. Ricci-Tersenghi", "J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo", "D. Yllanes" ], "comment": "Version accepted for publication in PRL. 1 page, 1 figure", "journal": "Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 219701 (2013)", "doi": "10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.219701", "categories": [ "cond-mat.dis-nn", "cond-mat.stat-mech" ], "abstract": "A recent interesting paper [Yucesoy et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 177204 (2012), arXiv:1206:0783] compares the low-temperature phase of the 3D Edwards-Anderson (EA) model to its mean-field counterpart, the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick (SK) model. The authors study the overlap distributions P_J(q) and conclude that the two models behave differently. Here we notice that a similar analysis using state-of-the-art, larger data sets for the EA model (generated with the Janus computer) leads to a very clear interpretation of the results of Yucesoy et al., showing that the EA model behaves as predicted by the replica symmetry breaking (RSB) theory.", "revisions": [ { "version": "v2", "updated": "2013-04-14T16:03:17.000Z" } ], "analyses": { "subjects": [ "75.10.Nr", "05.50.+q", "64.60.-i", "75.40.Mg" ], "keywords": [ "edwards-anderson spin-glass model", "non-mean-field-like low-temperature behavior", "larger data sets", "ea model behaves", "3d edwards-anderson" ], "tags": [ "journal article" ], "publication": { "publisher": "APS", "journal": "Physical Review Letters", "year": 2013, "month": "May", "volume": 110, "number": 21, "pages": 219701 }, "note": { "typesetting": "TeX", "pages": 1, "language": "en", "license": "arXiv", "status": "editable", "adsabs": "2013PhRvL.110u9701B" } } }