{
  "id": "1205.6672",
  "version": "v1",
  "published": "2012-05-30T13:34:46.000Z",
  "updated": "2012-05-30T13:34:46.000Z",
  "title": "Reply to \"Comment on 'Security proof for cryptographic protocols based only on the monogamy of Bell's inequality violations' \"",
  "authors": [
    "M. Pawlowski"
  ],
  "comment": "for the comment see arXiv:1204.4235",
  "journal": "PRA 85, 046302 (2012)",
  "categories": [
    "quant-ph"
  ],
  "abstract": "In this reply I address the comment by W-Y. Hwang and O. Gittsovich on my paper [Phys. Rev. A {\\bf 82}, 032313 (2010)]. The authors of the comment point out that I use implicit assumption that the alphabet of the eavesdropper is binary. They claim that such assumption is unrealistic. Here I show that even without this assumption the main result of my paper still holds.",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "version": "v1",
      "updated": "2012-05-30T13:34:46.000Z"
    }
  ],
  "analyses": {
    "subjects": [
      "03.67.Dd",
      "03.65.Ud",
      "03.67.Hk"
    ],
    "keywords": [
      "bells inequality violations",
      "cryptographic protocols",
      "security proof",
      "comment point",
      "implicit assumption"
    ],
    "tags": [
      "journal article"
    ],
    "publication": {
      "publisher": "APS",
      "journal": "Physical Review A",
      "doi": "10.1103/PhysRevA.85.046302",
      "year": 2012,
      "month": "Apr",
      "volume": 85,
      "number": 4,
      "pages": "046302"
    },
    "note": {
      "typesetting": "TeX",
      "pages": 0,
      "language": "en",
      "license": "arXiv",
      "status": "editable",
      "adsabs": "2012PhRvA..85d6302P"
    }
  }
}