{ "id": "1204.5363", "version": "v1", "published": "2012-04-24T13:11:10.000Z", "updated": "2012-04-24T13:11:10.000Z", "title": "Is there a Size Difference between Red and Blue Globular Clusters?", "authors": [ "J. M. B. Downing" ], "comment": "10 pages, 14 figures, 1 table. Submitted to MNRAS", "categories": [ "astro-ph.GA", "astro-ph.CO" ], "abstract": "Blue (metal-poor) globular clusters are observed to have half-light radii that are ~20% larger than their red (metal-rich) counterparts. The origin of this enhancement is not clear and differences in either the luminosity function or in the actual size of the clusters have been proposed. I analyze a set of dynamically self-consistent Monte Carlo globular cluster simulations to determine the origin of this enhancement. I find that my simulated blue clusters have larger half-light radii due to differences in the luminosity functions of metal-poor and metal-rich stars. I find that the blue clusters can also be physically larger, but only if they have a substantial number of black holes heating their central regions. In this case the difference between half-light radii is significantly larger than observed. I conclude that the observed difference in half-light radii between red and blue globular clusters is due to differences in their luminosity functions and that half-light radius is not a reliable proxy for cluster size.", "revisions": [ { "version": "v1", "updated": "2012-04-24T13:11:10.000Z" } ], "analyses": { "keywords": [ "blue globular clusters", "half-light radius", "size difference", "luminosity function", "self-consistent monte carlo globular cluster" ], "tags": [ "journal article" ], "publication": { "doi": "10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21680.x", "journal": "Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society", "year": 2012, "month": "Sep", "volume": 425, "number": 3, "pages": 2234 }, "note": { "typesetting": "TeX", "pages": 10, "language": "en", "license": "arXiv", "status": "editable", "inspire": 1112146, "adsabs": "2012MNRAS.425.2234D" } } }