{ "id": "1004.3188", "version": "v3", "published": "2010-04-19T13:30:15.000Z", "updated": "2010-12-23T12:26:27.000Z", "title": "Isoperimetric Inequalities for Minimal Submanifolds in Riemannian Manifolds: A Counterexample in Higher Codimension", "authors": [ "Victor Bangert", "Nena Roettgen" ], "comment": "11 pages, We changed the title and added a section that exhibits the relation between our example and the question posed by Brian White concerning isoperimetric inequalities for minimal submanifolds", "journal": "Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations: 45 (2012), no. 3, 455-466", "doi": "10.1007/s00526-011-0466-z", "categories": [ "math.DG" ], "abstract": "For compact Riemannian manifolds with convex boundary, B.White proved the following alternative: Either there is an isoperimetric inequality for minimal hypersurfaces or there exists a closed minimal hypersurface, possibly with a small singular set. There is the natural question if a similar result is true for submanifolds of higher codimension. Specifically, B.White asked if the non-existence of an isoperimetric inequality for k-varifolds implies the existence of a nonzero, stationary, integral k-varifold. We present examples showing that this is not true in codimension greater than two. The key step is the construction of a Riemannian metric on the closed four-dimensional ball B with the following properties: (1) B has strictly convex boundary. (2) There exists a complete nonconstant geodesic. (3) There does not exist a closed geodesic in B.", "revisions": [ { "version": "v3", "updated": "2010-12-23T12:26:27.000Z" } ], "analyses": { "subjects": [ "49Q20", "53C22", "49Q05", "53C42" ], "keywords": [ "isoperimetric inequality", "higher codimension", "minimal submanifolds", "convex boundary", "counterexample" ], "tags": [ "journal article" ], "note": { "typesetting": "TeX", "pages": 11, "language": "en", "license": "arXiv", "status": "editable", "adsabs": "2010arXiv1004.3188B" } } }