{ "id": "0903.0813", "version": "v2", "published": "2009-03-04T16:50:43.000Z", "updated": "2009-03-04T21:47:28.000Z", "title": "The Suslinian number and other cardinal invariants of continua", "authors": [ "T. Banakh", "V. V. Fedorchuk", "J. Nikiel", "M. Tuncali" ], "categories": [ "math.GN" ], "abstract": "By the {\\em Suslinian number} $\\Sln(X)$ of a continuum $X$ we understand the smallest cardinal number $\\kappa$ such that $X$ contains no disjoint family $\\C$ of non-degenerate subcontinua of size $|\\C|\\ge\\kappa$. For a compact space $X$, $\\Sln(X)$ is the smallest Suslinian number of a continuum which contains a homeomorphic copy of $X$. Our principal result asserts that each compact space $X$ has weight $\\le\\Sln(X)^+$ and is the limit of an inverse well-ordered spectrum of length $\\le \\Sln(X)^+$, consisting of compacta with weight $\\le\\Sln(X)$ and monotone bonding maps. Moreover, $w(X)\\le\\Sln(X)$ if no $\\Sln(X)^+$-Suslin tree exists. This implies that under the Suslin Hypothesis all Suslinian continua are metrizable, which answers a question of \\cite{DNTTT1}. On the other hand, the negation of the Suslin Hypothesis is equivalent to the existence of a hereditarily separable non-metrizable Suslinian continuum. If $X$ is a continuum with $\\Sln(X)<2^{\\aleph_0}$, then $X$ is 1-dimensional, has rim-weight $\\le\\Sln(X)$ and weight $w(X)\\ge\\Sln(X)$. Our main tool is the inequality $w(X)\\le\\Sln(X)\\cdot w(f(X))$ holding for any light map $f:X\\to Y$.", "revisions": [ { "version": "v2", "updated": "2009-03-04T21:47:28.000Z" } ], "analyses": { "subjects": [ "54F15" ], "keywords": [ "cardinal invariants", "separable non-metrizable suslinian continuum", "compact space", "suslin hypothesis", "principal result asserts" ], "note": { "typesetting": "TeX", "pages": 0, "language": "en", "license": "arXiv", "status": "editable", "adsabs": "2009arXiv0903.0813B" } } }