{
  "id": "0711.0514",
  "version": "v1",
  "published": "2007-11-05T09:36:16.000Z",
  "updated": "2007-11-05T09:36:16.000Z",
  "title": "Reply to Comment on ``Time-dependent quasi-Hermitian Hamiltonians and the unitary quantum evolution''",
  "authors": [
    "Miloslav Znojil"
  ],
  "comment": "4 pages, reply to preprint arXiv:0711.0137v1 [quant-ph]",
  "categories": [
    "quant-ph"
  ],
  "abstract": "In his fresh \"Comment\" (arXiv:0711.0137v1), A. Mostafazadeh reacts on my very recent letter (arXiv:0710.5653v1) where I tried to clarify certain misunderstandings which occurred in A. M., Phys. Lett. B \\textbf{650}, 208 (2007) [arXiv:0706.1872v2, \"Paper\"]. As long as the \"Comment\" offers a new support of the original assertions made in the \"Paper\", I feel obliged to re-clarify the matter by extending my argumentation. I insist that it is possible to escape the main conclusion of the \"Paper\", indeed. In particular, I point out a gap in the new calculations in \"Comment\", add a few remarks on the notation and reconfirm that the unitarity of the time-evolution DOES NOT require the time-independence of the metric operator.",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "version": "v1",
      "updated": "2007-11-05T09:36:16.000Z"
    }
  ],
  "analyses": {
    "keywords": [
      "unitary quantum evolution",
      "time-dependent quasi-hermitian hamiltonians",
      "mostafazadeh reacts",
      "original assertions",
      "main conclusion"
    ],
    "note": {
      "typesetting": "TeX",
      "pages": 4,
      "language": "en",
      "license": "arXiv",
      "status": "editable",
      "adsabs": "2007arXiv0711.0514Z"
    }
  }
}