{ "id": "0709.4232", "version": "v1", "published": "2007-09-26T18:30:49.000Z", "updated": "2007-09-26T18:30:49.000Z", "title": "Q-manifolds and Mackenzie theory: an overview", "authors": [ "Theodore Voronov" ], "comment": "LaTeX, 17 pages; based on a talk at ESI, August/September 2007", "categories": [ "math.DG", "math-ph", "math.MP", "math.SG" ], "abstract": "This text is meant to be a brief overview of the topics announced in the title and is based on my talk in Vienna (August/September 2007). It does not contain new results (except probably for a remark concerning Q-manifold homology, which I wish to elaborate elsewhere). \"Mackenzie theory\" stands for the rich circle of notions that have been put forward by Kirill Mackenzie (solo or in collaboration): double structures such as double Lie groupoids and double Lie algebroids, Lie bialgebroids and their doubles, nontrivial dualities for double and multiple vector bundles, etc. \"Q-manifolds\" are (super)manifolds with a homological vector field, i.e., a self-commuting odd vector field. They may have an extra Z-grading (called weight) not necessarily linked with the Z_2-grading (parity). I discuss double Lie algebroids (discovered by Mackenzie) and explain how this quite complicated fundamental notion is equivalent to a very simple one if the language of Q-manifolds is used. In particular, it shows how the two seemingly different notions of a \"Drinfeld double\" of a Lie bialgebroid due to Mackenzie and Roytenberg respectively, turn out to be the same thing if properly understood.", "revisions": [ { "version": "v1", "updated": "2007-09-26T18:30:49.000Z" } ], "analyses": { "subjects": [ "53D17", "17B62", "17B66", "18D05", "58A50", "58C50", "58H05" ], "keywords": [ "mackenzie theory", "double lie algebroids", "lie bialgebroid", "remark concerning q-manifold homology", "multiple vector bundles" ], "note": { "typesetting": "LaTeX", "pages": 17, "language": "en", "license": "arXiv", "status": "editable", "adsabs": "2007arXiv0709.4232V" } } }